Every LinkedIn rule you follow, checked against your own posts.

Keep it short. No links. Three hashtags. Post at 8am. We test the 19 most repeated rules on your last 300 to 800 posts and stamp each one: keep, ignore or test.

Founding price: 5 spots, then $295.

  • No login needed
  • Public posts only
  • Delivered in 48 hours
  • Full refund if it finds nothing to stop
RULE 02 / 19Keep it short

−30% on 237 posts

Wrong for him
RULE 13 / 19Use hashtags

no visible difference, 72 posts

Ignore
RULE 01 / 19Put a number in it

+48% on 471 posts

Keep

From the sample audit: Adam Robinson, 712 posts, 159k followers.

The rulebook, checked on one founder

All nineteen rules on Adam Robinson's 712 posts. Each post is compared only with his own posts from the same month, so his growing audience does not skew the result.

01Put a specific number in the post+48%471 postsKeep
02Keep it short−30%237 postsWrong for him
03Always add an image+21%212 postsKeep
04Write in the first person+23%160 postsKeep
05Never put a link in the post−15%338 postsTrue, small
06Long posts build authority+37%236 postsRides on numbers
07Lots of white space+24%238 postsLuck
08Lists beat prose+21%421 postsA few hits
09Ask questions to get comments−9%456 postsNo difference
10Tag people to borrow their audience−6%466 postsNo difference
11Open with a story+17%135 postsTest
12Never post at the weekend+16%165 postsTest
13Hashtags extend reach−3%72 postsToo few posts
14Always end with a question−9%42 postsToo few posts
15Use three to five hashtags+6%19 postsToo few posts
16Carousels get the most reach−17%8 postsToo few posts
17Shout the hook in capitals−24%7 postsToo few posts
18Post in the morningn/a2 postsToo few posts
19Video wins everywheren/a0 postsNever tried

Reactions compared with his own posts from the same 30 days. Adjusted so lucky streaks do not count. Read the full audit

Get your own rulebook checked, $95

Your analytics shows charts. Your ghostwriter shows drafts. Nobody shows you what to drop.

Most LinkedIn advice was never tested, and none of it was tested on your account. FeedVerdict answers one question: of everything you do on LinkedIn, what actually works for you, and what is wasted effort?

Three verdicts, your numbers behind each

Every line in the report is a figure from your own posts. Where your data cannot answer a question, the report says so instead of guessing.

Keep

What clearly works for you

Usually two to four habits, each with the size of the effect.

Adam: a specific number in the post, +48%

Ignore

What you can stop worrying about

Rules that make no real difference for you, and rules you have not used enough to judge. We say which is which.

Adam: hashtags, tagging, asking questions

Test

What to try next

Open questions your history cannot settle, each with our prediction of what a test will show.

Adam: story openings, predicted +15 to 20%

Also in the report: your ten best posts against your own baseline, and up to five of your own rules tested (your playbook or your ghostwriter's).

48 hours, start to finish

No login, no access to your account, nothing to install.

HOUR 0

Send your profile

Your LinkedIn URL, plus up to five rules you want checked.

HOUR 1 TO 24

We go through your posts

Your last 300 to 800 public posts, each compared with your own posts from the same month.

HOUR 48

You get your verdict

Keep, ignore, test, in plain language, with the numbers behind every line.

Why the sample is Adam Robinson

$0 to $5Min annual revenue in 12 months, with his LinkedIn as RB2B's only channel

He is one of the founders most often held up as proof that LinkedIn alone can build a company, and he teaches his approach openly, so his habits get copied.

He has also posted almost every day for three years. That is enough history to test nineteen rules properly. If the standard rules hold anywhere, they should hold on his account. On his account, the most repeated one of all, keep it short, turned out to be wrong.

No connection to him. Sources: SaaStock, Founderpath.

Your posts, not averagesStudies tell you what works across thousands of accounts. This tells you what works on yours.
"No" and "can't tell" kept apartWhen there is not enough data, we say so, and how much would be needed.
Luck filtered outTest nineteen rules and one or two look good by chance. Those do not reach your keep list.
Ends in a testLooking back shows what goes with better results. Only a test on your account shows what causes them.

For ghostwriters and LinkedIn agencies

Prove your work with numbers your client can't argue with

Run it on a client before a renewal, on a prospect before the pitch, or on your own playbook. Under your brand if you prefer.

$150per audit, five or more a month

Price list

One audit first. Everything else follows from what it finds. For scale: a LinkedIn ghostwriter typically costs $2,000 to $10,000 a month, and still cannot tell you which of their habits work for you.

The audit

$295$95

  • Founding price, first five only
  • 300 to 800 posts
  • 19 rules plus 5 of yours
  • Test plan with predictions
  • PDF in 48 hours
Guaranteed

The "one thing to stop" guarantee. If your audit does not give you at least one habit you can safely stop spending time on, reply to the delivery email and you get a full refund. No forms, no questions.

Agency

$150 / audit

  • Five or more a month
  • For clients or prospects
  • Your brand on request

Test program

$1,500 / month

  • After an audit, three months minimum
  • One change tested at a time
  • A coin flip decides which posts carry it
  • Prediction written down first
  • Measured with your own impressions
  • A verdict every month

Fair questions

How many posts do I need?

At least 150, ideally 300 or more. With fewer, most rules come back as "too few posts", and the test program is the better start.

Do you need my login?

No. The audit uses only your public posts. The test program asks you to share your own analytics export each week, nothing more.

Can you see my impressions?

Not from public posts. The audit measures reactions and comments. The test program adds impressions, because you export them for us.

Is this AI-written advice?

No. Every line is a number from your own posts. Where the data cannot answer, the report says so.

Does it prove what causes my results?

No, and we will never claim it does. Looking back shows what goes with better results. Proving cause takes a test on your own account.

Will you publish my audit?

Never without your permission. Adam Robinson's is public because it covers a public figure's public posts.

Where do the 19 rules come from?

They are the advice repeated most across LinkedIn growth content: creator playbooks, ghostwriter threads, "how I grew to 100k" posts. You can add five of your own.

Who is behind this?

Marco Cosulich, 17 years in growth, partnerships and digital marketing, including Bitpanda and NEOM. Questions or agency volume: marco@marcomdigi.com

What do your own posts say?

Five founding audits at $95. Send your profile today, have your keep, ignore and test lists in 48 hours, or your money back.

Get your verdict, $95
Founding price $95 · 5 spotsGet your verdict